Legal Opinion

People v. Budd

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 1976PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The defendant was denied a fair trial as a matter of law.

Though both sides were represented by able and experienced counsel, from the beginning to the end the Trial Judge omnivorously and intolerably injected himself into the trial, monopolizing it by excessive and prejudicial questioning throughout.

The defendant admitted firing the fatal shot in this barroom brawl. There was no question of identity. There was no charge of premeditation. There was no denial of intent. In short, the issues were neither complex nor subtle. Yet, the unrelenting pressure the trial court exerted…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. MoultonNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. People v. De JesusNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. People v. JamisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. People v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. People v. SingletaryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API