Legal Opinion

Lenhardt Tool & Die Co., Inc. v. Lumpe

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 2000No. 49A05-9706-CV-216PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1DissentBoehm, Justice

I believe we should grant transfer to clarify the standard for summary judgment in Indiana under Trial Rule 56.

On August 22, 1992, an explosion occurred at the Olin Brass factory in Indianapolis injuring Duane Lumpe, who worked for Olin as a “melter.” Olin manufactures brass bars using molds made by Lenhardt, among other firms. Lumpe sued Lenhardt and Lenhardt filed a motion for summary judgment, contending that, after adequate discovery, it was un-controverted that Lumpe could prove neither that Lenhardt manufactured the mold in question nor that the mold was defective. The trial court first…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  3. Bill Clark Herbert Futch Austin Hurst Louis Sliker and William Barrineau v. Coats & Clark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  4. Steelvest, Inc. v. Scansteel Service Center, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cole v. GohmannIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Deuitch v. FlemingIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Harvey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Conner v. HoweDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2004
  5. Brannon v. WilsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API