Cole v. Gohmann
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KIRSCH, Judge
Appellant-defendant Kenneth Cole appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee-codefendant Janice Gohmann. Specifically, Cole asserts that the entry of summary judgment for Gohmann should be reversed because a genuine issue of material fact remains as to whether she breached a duty of care to the plaintiffs-appellees, Jeffrey and Shan-ice Brazell-Dodson (collectively, the “Dod-sons”),1 who were passengers in Cole’s automobile. We agree and reverse.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The Dodsons filed a complaint against Cole seeking damages which arose…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jarboe v. Landmark Community Newspapers of Indiana, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Jacques v. Allied Building Services of Indiana, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Chaney v. TingleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Lacy-McKinney v. Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- McDonald v. LattireIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Thomas Haggerty and Cathy Haggerty v. Anonymous Party 1, Anonymous Party 2, and Anonymous Party 3Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Dado v. JeeningaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Brannon v. WilsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.