Stork v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
LATTIMORE, Judge.
Conviction for manufacturing intoxicating liquor; punishment, one year in the penitentiary.
The testimony seems amply sufficient to support the conviction. There are five bills of exception in which are presented but two complaints, one of which is that the premises to be searched were not sufficiently described, and the other of which is that the signature of the justice of the peace who took the affidavit for search warrant, as appended to said affidavit and also to the search warrant, was made with a rubber stamp. The description of the property to be searched in the search…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Herrick v. MorrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Mezchen v. MoreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Ligare v. California Southern RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Cocciola v. Wood-Dickerson Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1902
- Cummings v. LandesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Benavides v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
- In Re BarberTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Roy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Ex Parte SpencerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961
- Estes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.