Legal Opinion

Arbintrode v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1879PublishedCited by 21 opinions

From the Huntington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

An indictment, properly found in the court below, charged, that the appellant, “on,” etc., “at,” etc., “did then and there unlawfully sell intoxicating'liquor, to wit, one gill, to one Franklin Churchill, at and for the price of five cents; he, the said Franklin Churchill, being then and there 'a person under the age of twenty-one years,” etc.

*268The appellant pleaded guilty to the indictment, and was fined. He has appealed and assigned for error, in substance, that the facts alleged in the indictment do not constitute an offence.

If it be true that the facts alleged do not constitute an offence,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McCool v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Reams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Henderson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Willard v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1853
  5. O'Brien v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Boos v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. State v. RosenblattSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
  3. Walter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Hamilton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. State v. SavageWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1920

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API