Legal Opinion

Comforto v. Skirke

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1939No. Docket No. 90, Calendar No. 40,612PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBttshnelIi, J.

Plaintiff, Anna Comforto, filed an amended bill of complaint on October 26, 1938, for the purpose of restraining and enjoining defendants from moving, changing or molesting a fence and shed which she claims constitutes the north boundary of her premises located on the westerly side of Concord avenue in the city of Detroit. Defendant Skirke, who is purchasing under land contract from the Regents of the University of Michigan a lot occupied by him as a coal yard located on the southerly side of Grratiot avenue, denied that the shed and fence con stituted the southerly boundary of his property…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Yelverton v. SteeleMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Sheldon v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Bean v. BeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. King v. Battle Creek Box Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Ruggles v. DandisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rozmarek v. PlamondonMichigan Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API