Rozmarek v. Plamondon
Michigan Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This is an adverse possession case. We face two issues: whether the plaintiffs’ possession of the disputed property was sufficiently open and notorious, and whether the plaintiffs’ claim of adverse possession is defeated by the fact that a portion of the disputed property clearly remained under the control of the defendants’ predecessor in title during the years in question.
I
In 1946, the plaintiffs purchased lot 20 of Engel-mann’s Addition to the City of Manistee. This case concerns the adjacent lot 21. Lots 21 and 22 were owned by the Olson family, which operated a lumber company not far…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hart v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Burns v. FosterMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- McVannel v. Pure Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Sheldon v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Monroe v. RawlingsMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- West Michigan Dock & Market Corp. v. Lakeland InvestmentsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Davids v. DavisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- CONSUMERS ENERGY v. BeardMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
- Craig a Martyn v. Mel WhiteMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Craig a Martyn v. Mel WhiteMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.