Legal Opinion

Rozmarek v. Plamondon

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1984No. Docket 70603PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an adverse possession case. We face two issues: whether the plaintiffs’ possession of the disputed property was sufficiently open and notorious, and whether the plaintiffs’ claim of adverse possession is defeated by the fact that a portion of the disputed property clearly remained under the control of the defendants’ predecessor in title during the years in question.

I

In 1946, the plaintiffs purchased lot 20 of Engel-mann’s Addition to the City of Manistee. This case concerns the adjacent lot 21. Lots 21 and 22 were owned by the Olson family, which operated a lumber company not far…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hart v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Burns v. FosterMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. McVannel v. Pure Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Sheldon v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Monroe v. RawlingsMichigan Supreme Court · 1951

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. West Michigan Dock & Market Corp. v. Lakeland InvestmentsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Davids v. DavisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. CONSUMERS ENERGY v. BeardMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Craig a Martyn v. Mel WhiteMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Craig a Martyn v. Mel WhiteMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API