Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Wilson

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided August 28, 1970No. 22,776PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

Paragraph 1545, Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1969 (Revised edition), provides that when an accused has pleaded not guilty, “a stipulation which practically amounts to a confession should not be received in evidence.” At trial, the accused and his counsel consented to the admission into evidence of a stipulation of facts. It is now contended that receipt of the stipulation in evidence violated the Manual provision.

The accused was arraigned before a military judge, sitting without court members, on a charge of desertion terminated by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  2. United States v. CambridgeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  3. United States v. PetersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  4. United States v. GerlachUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
  5. United States v. NickaboineUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. BertelsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  2. United States v. EasonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  3. United States v. AielloUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  4. United States v. KeppleU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988
  5. United States v. KrampfU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API