Legal Opinion

Cates v. Pon

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 15, 1983No. B14-83-236CVPublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CANNON, Justice.

This is an appeal by writ of error from a default judgment rendered against James N. Cates in a suit upon a promissory note. Appellant contends that the judgment against him is void for want of in personam jurisdiction because the service and return of citation were fatally defective. We agree.

On October 13, 1980, appellee filed suit against appellant and his wife, Elizabeth Cates, upon a promissory note. Mrs. Cates was duly served with citation and filed an answer. Appellee was unable to obtain service upon appellant. On December 21, 1981, appellee obtained permission…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McKanna v. EdgarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Lawyers Lloyds v. WebbTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Harrison v. Dallas Court Reporting College, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Mega v. Anglo Iron & Metal Co. of HarlingenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Hanover Modular Homes of Taft, Inc. v. Corpus Christi Bank & TrustCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Marrot Communications, Inc. v. Town & Country Partnership, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
  2. Pharmakinetics Laboratories, Inc. v. Katz, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1986
  3. Verlander Enterprises, Inc. v. Graham, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1996
  4. Garrels v. Wales Transportation, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
  5. Bronze & Beautiful, Inc. v. MahoneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API