Legal Opinion

Bronze & Beautiful, Inc. v. Mahone

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 26, 1988No. 9621PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CORNELIUS, Chief Justice.

Bronze & Beautiful, Inc. appeals from a default judgment rendered against it in a deceptive trade practices action. It argues that the judgment is invalid because it was rendered without proper service of process. We agree.

The suit arose out of a contract executed by Cathy Mahone for membership in Beverly Ann’s Figure Salon of Marshall. The salon was subsequently purchased and operated by Bronze & Beautiful, Inc. Ma-hone filed suit against Bronze & Beautiful under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, alleging that it failed to comply with advertising…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Peralta v. Heights Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. McKanna v. EdgarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Cates v. PonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. Pharmakinetics Laboratories, Inc. v. Katz, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1986
  5. Dan Edge Motors, Inc. v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Wilson v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. G.F.S. Ventures, Inc. v. Harris, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1996
  3. All Commercial Floors, Inc. v. Barton & RasorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  4. C.C.G. Matter OfCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. $24,156.00 in U.S. Currency v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API