Bronze & Beautiful, Inc. v. Mahone
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
CORNELIUS, Chief Justice.
Bronze & Beautiful, Inc. appeals from a default judgment rendered against it in a deceptive trade practices action. It argues that the judgment is invalid because it was rendered without proper service of process. We agree.
The suit arose out of a contract executed by Cathy Mahone for membership in Beverly Ann’s Figure Salon of Marshall. The salon was subsequently purchased and operated by Bronze & Beautiful, Inc. Ma-hone filed suit against Bronze & Beautiful under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, alleging that it failed to comply with advertising…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Peralta v. Heights Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- McKanna v. EdgarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Cates v. PonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Pharmakinetics Laboratories, Inc. v. Katz, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1986
- Dan Edge Motors, Inc. v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
3Cited by28 opinions
- Wilson v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- G.F.S. Ventures, Inc. v. Harris, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1996
- All Commercial Floors, Inc. v. Barton & RasorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
- C.C.G. Matter OfCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- $24,156.00 in U.S. Currency v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.