Legal Opinion

Labor Ready v. Mogensen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 16, 2015No. 1205059; A157258PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, P. J.

Claimant suffered a compensable injury that resulted in the partial amputation of his left index finger. He subsequently filed a “new or omitted medical condition claim” pursuant to ORS 656.267, seeking acceptance of a consequential condition that he described as “complex regional pain syndrome.” Employer denied the claim, but the Workers’ Compensation Board (the board) determined that it was compensable. Employer now seeks review of the board’s determination. The question on judicial review is whether the board correctly determined that it could address the compensability of the ultimately…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. SAIF Corp. v. CalderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Crawford v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. SAIF Corp. v. DobbsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. Saif Corp. v. DobbsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. Boeing Aircraft Co. v. RoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. DeBoard v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. SAIF v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API