Legal Opinion

Bauder v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided November 22, 1996No. 04-93-00725-CRPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RICKHOFF, Justice.

Appellant, Samuel Bauder (“Bauder”), is charged with a misdemeanor, driving while intoxicated. We affirmed the lower court’s denial of Bauder’s petition for pretrial writ of habeas corpus and held that Bauder’s trial was not jeopardy barred under the Texas and United States Constitutions after a mistrial was granted in an earlier trial at Bauder’s request. 1 Bauder v. State, 880 S.W.2d 502 (Tex.App. — San Antonio 1994), rev’d, 921 S.W.2d 696 (Tex.CrimApp.1996). The mistrial was granted after the arresting officer graphically testified on direct examination that Bauder…

Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kemp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Stoker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Bauder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Schwarz v. Florida Supreme CourtSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Hadden v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LewisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  2. Ex Parte BauderCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  3. State v. LeeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  4. Vasquez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2000
  5. Ex Parte PrimroseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API