Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Primrose

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 14, 1997No. 2-97-079-CRPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LIVINGSTON, Justice.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether appellant’s capital murder prosecution is jeopardy barred after a State’s witness in appellant’s first trial invoked his right to remain silent after giving direct testimony and appellant’s request for a mistrial was granted. Because we find that a mistrial was not necessary at appellant’s request, we affirm the habeas court’s denial of relief.

I. BACKGROUND

In appellant’s first trial for the capital murder of Sharon Oliver, the State called former co-defendant Andrew Hood. Hood testified that he had been charged with the *777capita…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. Bauder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. United States v. John Cardillo, Lawrence Harris, Ralph Kaminsky, John Knapp, Louis Margolis, and Louis PiselliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  5. Keller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  2. Barnes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  3. State v. DeLeon, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1998
  4. Ex Parte TwineCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  5. Ex Parte Jacob Ryan Evans, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2013

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API