Legal Opinion

Fontenot v. Ludeau

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 28, 1938No. 34872PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’NIELL, Chief Justice.

This is a suit to annul a sale on the ground of fraud. The deed is dated September 4, 1934, and purports to be a sale by the plaintiff of a half interest in the mineral rights in a tract of land having an area of 28 acres belonging to the plaintiff. She avers that at the time when the sale was made the land was subject to a mineral lease in favor of one of the defendants, dated August 18, 1931, and that the deed dated September 4, 1934, purporting to transfer half of her mineral rights, was prepared and written by the defendants, or by one of them representing the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Scurto v. Le BlancSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  2. Bywater v. EnderleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
  3. Cusachs v. DugueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  4. Wells v. WellsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  5. Walker v. VillavasoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1866

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Little v. HaikSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1964
  2. Lawrence v. ClaiborneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  3. Mullins v. De Soto Securities Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1942
  4. Cernich v. CernichSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1946
  5. Burt v. ValoisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API