Legal Opinion

Little v. Haik

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 4, 1964No. 46910PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCALEB, Justice.

This is a suit for enforcement of an oral agreement of joint adventure allegedly confected by plaintiffs and defendant for the purpose of acquiring certain oil, gas and mineral leases. The plaintiffs, Little and Hayes, are consulting geologists and the defendant, Haik, is an attorney-at-law. The petition alleges, in substance, that' Haik proposed to Little during October, 1958 that they buy leases for their joint account; that Little, after consulting Hayes and obtaining his approval, reached an agreement with Haik whereby the latter was to purchase mineral leases in his name…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Hayes v. MullerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
  2. Reagan v. MurphySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
  3. Hanby v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  4. Harvey v. RichardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  5. Scurto v. Le BlancSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  2. Plaquemines Parish Com'n Council v. PerezSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  3. Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Company v. GoslinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
  4. Alexander & Alexander, Inc. v. STATE EX REL. DIV. OF ADMIN.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  5. Bolding v. Eason Oil CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API