Koppers Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Senior Judge Barbieri,
Koppers Company, Inc., and its insurer, Travelers Insurance Company, seek review by this Court of an order of the Workmens Compensation Appeal Board which affirmed a referees decision awarding benefits for disability from silicosis designating Koppers as the solely responsible employer under the terms of Sections 108(k) and 301(c)(2) of The Pennsylvania Workmens Compensation Act (Act), 77 P.S. §§27.1, 411. We will affirm.
Claimant, William W. Boyle, described as an industrial bricklayer, carried out this occupation in construction trades for a period from 1946…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McCloskey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Kusenko v. Republic Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Industrial Services Contracting, Inc. v. WilsonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Werner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Huff v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- General Electric Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Songer Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Ray Oaks Machine Shop v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- C. Ciarolla v. WCAB (Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.