Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Standard Life Ins.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1928No. File No. 6357PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MISER, C.

This appeal is from a judgment and order overruling the motion of appellant Holmes for a new trial in an action wherein respondent Rogers was plaintiff, Standard Life Insurance Company was defendant, and appellant Holmes was intervener. For the purpose of trial in circuit court, this action was consolidated with another. In the other action, Holmes was plaintiff and Standard Life Insurance Company and Rogers were defendants. Separate judgments were rendered on the decision of the court, and no appeal has been taken in the action in which Holmes was plaintiff, nor is the insurance…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. George E. Lloyd & Co. v. MatthewsIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Sweeny v. United Underwriters Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Karlsson v. OdlandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Hipple v. StrohbehnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Relf v. CameronSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Boekelheide v. SnyderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Vogel v. ShawWyoming Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Raphtis v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Federal Land Bank of Omaha v. MatsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Smith v. McKeeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API