Hipple v. Strohbehn
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from Circuit Court, Charles Mix County. How. Robert B. Tripp, Judge. Action by R. W. Hippie and another, against F. S. Strohbehn. From a judgment for defendant, and from an order denying a new trial, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtGates, J.
Action for damages for deceit. Trial to the court without a jury. Findings and judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.
*103[1] Appellant argues two propositions, viz.: (i) Alleged errors in admitting evidence; (2) the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the findings of fact. This being a case tried to the court without a jury, we must presume that .the court, in making its findings, rejected all incompetent and improper evidence. Breeden v. Martens, 21 S. D. 357, 112 N. W. 960; Squier v. Mitchell, 32 S. D. 342, 143 N. W. 277; Schmidt v. Scanlan, 32 S. D. 608, 144 N. W. 128; McKinnon v.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pierce v. ManningSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
- Carroll v. NisbetSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
- Squier v. MitchellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- Berke v. McCook CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
- Whaley v. VidalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wall v. WallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Rogers v. Standard Life Ins.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
- Relf v. CameronSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
- Loveland v. PerritonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
- Youngquist v. American Railway Express Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1926