United States Mission Corp. v. KIRO TV, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.
¶1 — Falsity is an element of a common law claim of defamation. But, a defendant against whom a defamation claim is asserted need not prove the literal truth of every defamatory statement. Rather, to prevail, a defendant need only show that the statement is substantially true or that the gist of the story, the portion that carries the “sting,” is true. Here, the gist of the two stories KIRO TV Inc. broadcast and published on its web site about United States Mission Corporation (US Mission) is true, even though some statements, such as that US Mission “recruited” felons and sent “bevies” of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Mark v. Seattle TimesWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- Herron v. KING Broadcasting, Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Mohr v. GrantWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Mohr v. GrantWashington Supreme Court · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dillon v. Seattle Deposition Reporters, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Spratt v. ToftCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Davis v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Johnson v. RyanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Jodi Williams, V. Shawn GilliesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.