Wright v. Miller
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
LOGSDON, O.
Plaintiff has assigned numerous errors in his petition in error and has presented each by argument and authorities in his briqf, but in the view taken of the case here it will only be necessary to consider the third and sixth. By reason; of the relation of .these proi»sitions to each other they will be considered together, and the question for determination may be stated thus.: Are the allegations and proof of the defendant sufficient to establish fraud and misrepresentation, and has the defendant by his acts estopped himself from setting up the defense of breach of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. WareSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Brown v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Spaulding v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Simonoff v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Talley v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
3Cited by2 opinions
- McMurray v. Witherspoon Livestock Commission Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Metal Forms Corp. v. ClemansOhio Court of Appeals · 1931