Legal Opinion

Wright v. Miller

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 17, 1925No. 15274PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LOGSDON, O.

Plaintiff has assigned numerous errors in his petition in error and has presented each by argument and authorities in his briqf, but in the view taken of the case here it will only be necessary to consider the third and sixth. By reason; of the relation of .these proi»sitions to each other they will be considered together, and the question for determination may be stated thus.: Are the allegations and proof of the defendant sufficient to establish fraud and misrepresentation, and has the defendant by his acts estopped himself from setting up the defense of breach of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. WareSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Brown v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Spaulding v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Simonoff v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Talley v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McMurray v. Witherspoon Livestock Commission Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Metal Forms Corp. v. ClemansOhio Court of Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API