Legal Opinion

Metal Forms Corp. v. Clemans

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1931Published

1Opinion of the CourtHornbeck, J.

This is a proceeding in error. The parties here hold the same relative positions as in the trial court, and will be referred to in this opinion as plaintiff and defendant.

The action was on a note given by the defendant,. Arthur Clemans, to plaintiff in the sum of $762.16; a second cause of action was set forth in the petition on an account. The second cause of action was disposed of in the trial court without objection or exception.

The second amended answer and cross-petition of defendant set forth a general denial of any amount due on the note, although its execution and delivery were…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lunsford, Maxwell & Co. v. Malsby & AverySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Marmet Coal Co. v. People's Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  3. Louis Eckels & Sons Ice Manufacturing Co. v. Cornell Economizer Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
  4. Herbrand Co. v. Lackawanna Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
  5. King v. DobbsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API