Legal Opinion
Lindsey v. Prillman
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 19, 2007No. 06-CV-646PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Senior Judge:
In this case of a complaint for possession of real property, appellant Jerome Lindsey, Jr. asserts that the Landlord and Tenant Branch erred in failing to enter a protective order and in “refusing to grant plaintiffs request for an undertaking following the plea of title filed by defendant as a defense to the action for possession.” We affirm. 1
I
On March 2, 2006, appellant filed a complaint seeking to recover possession of a residence located at 805 Rittenhouse Street, N.W. He alleged that he was the landlord of the premises and that the tenant, appellee Romnalda…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- William T. Bell and Margie Bell v. Tsintolas Realty Company, James Coates v. Ruppert Real Estate, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Flack v. LasterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Akassy v. William Penn Apartments Ltd. PartnershipDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- McQueen v. Lustine Realty Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Wallace v. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ward v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department v. Fraternal Order of Police/Metropolitan Police Department Labor CommitteeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Crockett v. Deutsche Bank National TrustDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Graham v. LANIER ASSOCIATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- B.F. Saul Co. v. TiefenbacherDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.