Legal Opinion
Wallace v. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 30, 2002No. 00-CV-844, 00-CV-1168, 00-CV-1330PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REID, Associate Judge:
These are consolidated cases involving an action for discrimination brought by appellant Katherine T. Wallace, Ph.D, against her former law firm and individual partners of the firm, appellees Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP (“Skadden”) and Antoinette Cook Bush, Thomas J. Casey, and Neal S. McCoy (collectively “appellees”). Dr. Wallace appeals from the grant of summary judgment in favor of appellees on her discrimination complaint (No. 00-CV-1168), and from judgments relating to costs awarded to appellees (Nos. 00-CV-844 & 00-CV-1330). 1 We affirm.
FACTUAL SUMMARY
D…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Warren A. PROUD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael P.W. STONE, Secretary of the Army, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Hansford P. Miller v. Jackson AviromCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Colbert v. Georgetown UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Wallace v. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & FlomDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Hollins v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- McFarland v. George Washington UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Clampitt v. American UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Clawson v. St. Louis Post-Dispatch, L.L.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Gomez v. Independence Management of Delaware, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Powell v. American Red CrossDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.