Legal Opinion

Swentzell's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 1928No. Appeal, 137PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

In construing wills the courts are always searching for the testator’s true intent. The sole question for de termination in the present case is whether the real estate of the deceased passed under the residuary clause.

Testator was an unmarried man, by profession a dentist. His next of kin were an uncle and several cousins. The orphans’ court has found from the evidence that they were nothing to him. Decedent wrote his own will. In it he directed the payment of his debts and funeral expenses. These it turned out amounted respectively to $6,408.75 and $12,681.75.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mayer's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Joseph Wilkins v. David AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  3. Tarter's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Frisbie's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Talbot v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brennan's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Lockhart's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Hunsinger v. LandgrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Fleck v. Harmstad, KingsleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Alexander's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API