Legal Opinion

Fleck v. Harmstad, Kingsley

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 13, 1931No. Appeal, 239PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

On May 10, 1863, George R. Harmstad died seized of certain real estate situate in Philadelphia. His will, dated January 11, 1859, was duly probated. The final remainder under that will, by adjudication of the Orphans’ Court of Philadelphia County was on March 12, 1929, declared invalid for violation of the rule against perpetuities. As a result it was held that title to certain real estate of which Harmstad died seized was vested from 1863 in Harmstad’s heirs at law. Harmstad was survived by four brothers and one sister, each of whom took a one-fifth interest in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Delafield v. . BarlowNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Williamson's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. SchoulerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  4. Estate of JacobsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  5. Thompson's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ingham's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Parker v. HoughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Dublin EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Salt Lake County v. Utah Copper Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
  5. Estate of FeliceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API