Legal Opinion

Lockhart's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 6, 1932No. Appeals, 338, 347 and 356PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaerer,

In this proceeding we are called upon to construe the will of Josephine Lockhart. The court below determined that in certain features it violates the rule against perpetuities and awarded the estate under the intestate laws. It is contended by the various appellants that this adjudication is wrong.

It has been said that no will has a brother. It is doubtful whether this one has even more distant relatives. Its complexities have bothered counsel and courts in the past (see Lockhart’s Est., 267 Pa. 390) and still continue to do so. We are now asked to determine…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. City of Philadelphia v. Heirs of GirardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1863
  2. Barton v. ThawSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  3. Feeney's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Appeal of CogginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  5. Lilley's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Newlin EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Quigley's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Verner EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Friday's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Wanamaker's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API