Legal Opinion

The Hope Clinic for Women, Ltd. v. Flores

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 2013No. 112673, 112704 consPublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Supreme Court Hope Clinic for Women, Ltd. v. Flores,

2013 IL 112673

Caption in Supreme THE HOPE CLINIC FOR WOMEN, LTD., et al., Appellees, v. Court: MANUEL FLORES, Acting Secretary of the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, et al., Appellants (Stewart Umholtz, State’s Attorney, Tazewell County, Illinois, et al., Proposed Intervening Appellants). Docket Nos. 112673, 112704 cons. Filed July 11, 2013 Held Illinois’ Parental Notice of Abortion Act of 1995, which was found valid (Note: This syllabus by a federal court in 2009 and has never been…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Kanerva v. WeemsIllinois Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Bartlow v. CostiganIllinois Supreme Court · 2014
  3. People v. RizzoIllinois Supreme Court · 2016
  4. In re M.A.Illinois Supreme Court · 2015
  5. People v. SavageAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API