Legal Opinion

State v. Copes

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 28, 2017No. 84/16PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

Advances in personal technology, like the cell phone, empower individual users but may also threaten personal privacy. When police make use of the features of that technology to solve crime, courts and lawyers sometimes struggle to devise ground rules that respect constitutional privacy protections. *586This case involves an example of the law’s effort to keep apace.

Detectives investigating the gruesome murder of a young homeless woman in Baltimore City determined that a cell phone associated with her—but not found with her body—was still in active use. Hoping to find the phone—and the…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AlmonorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
  2. State v. GaliciaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  3. Whittington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  4. Whittington v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  5. Graham v. WebsterDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API