Legal Opinion

Graham v. Webster

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided September 9, 2019No. 8:16-cv-02824Unknown

1Opinion

Ae oo □□ _ IN|THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT — OR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND a8 a8 of EDWARD GRAHAM, * qoreceane □□□ osaa Petitioner * . wt v. * _ Civil Action No. PJIM-16-2824 DARYL WEBSTER and * THE ATTORNEY GENE L OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND: * Respondents * ek MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending is “ue r Edward Graham’s pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C, § 2254, es the trial court lacked jurisdiction to convict and sentence him. Respondents filed a ee Answer, which they supplemented at direction of the court, seeking summary dismissal of the|Petition. ECF No. 8, 19.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Rose v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API