Legal Opinion

Whittington v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 2, 2021No. 35/20PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kevin Whittington v. State of Maryland, No. 35, September Term 2020. Opinion by Hotten, J. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – FOURTH AMENDMENT – WARRANT REQUIREMENT – Detectives applied for and received a court order, pursuant to Md. Code Ann., Criminal Procedure (“Crim. Proc.”) § 1-203.1, that authorized the placement of a tracking device on Petitioner’s vehicle for thirty days. Thereafter, members of law enforcement executed a search of Petitioner’s vehicle and residence, pursuant to a search warrant supported in part by location information provided through the tracking device. Petitioner challenged…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Washington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  2. Rovin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024
  3. Caples v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024
  4. Caples v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024
  5. Riley v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2025

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API