United States v. Tate & Lyle North American Sugars, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
BERMAN, District Judge.
I. Introduction
On or about December 10, 1997, plaintiff the United States of America (“Plaintiff’ or the “IRS” or the “Government”) commenced this action, “seek[ing] to recover a $1,526,100.60 interest payment it made to defendant Tate & Lyle North American Sugars, Inc., successor to Domino Sugar Corporation, formerly known as Amstar Sugar Corporation ..., when the [IRS] returned a remittance that Amstar sent the IRS in December 1990.” 1 PreTrial Memorandum of Law of Plaintiff United States (“Pl.Mem.”), dated April 25, 2002, at…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- West Virginia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. WurtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Rosenman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Wickham Contracting Co., Inc., Ralph Perone v. Local Union No. 3, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Domino Sugar Corporation, Tate & Lyle North American Sugars Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- E.W. Scripps Co. & Subsidiaries v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003