Legal Opinion
United States v. Railway Employes' Department
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 5, 1923No. 2943PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILKERSON, District Judge.
The defendants filed their joint and several answers on October 6, 1922. Thereupon they presented their motion for a dissolution of the temporary injunction granted September 23, 1922, 283 Fed. 479, and for a dismissal of the bill. This motion was argued at length, and briefs have been filed on both sides. The answer contains 56 printed pages, and so far as this motion is concerned may be treated as denying the substantial averments of the bill relative to the alleged unlawful conspiracy to obstruct interstate commerce and the carriage of the mails. The answer also…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mamula v. Satralloy, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1984
- White v. Federal Radio CommmissionDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1928
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. StroehmannDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1934
- Activated Sludge, Inc. v. Filtros, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1935
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.