Legal Opinion
Activated Sludge, Inc. v. Filtros, Inc.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided March 23, 1935No. 1892Published
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPEY, District Judge.
This action was commenced September 14, 1934, to recover damages and profits resulting from and injunctive relief against defendant’s infringement of United States letters patent (1) No. 1,247,540 issued November 20, 1917, (2) No. 1,247,542 issued November 20, 1917, (3) No. 1,247,543 issued November 20, 1917, and reissue thereof No. 15,140 dated July 5, 1921, (4) No. 1,282,587 issued October 22, 1918, (5) No. 1,286,017 issued November 28, 1918, and (6) No. 1,-*242341,561 issued May 25,1920, to Walter Jones and now owned by plaintiff. The patents numbered above (1), (2),…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Leeds & Catlin Co. v. Victor Talking MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Richards v. Chase Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Kansas v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Ohio Brass Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
- City of Milwaukee v. Activated Sludge, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.