Legal Opinion

Lomax v. Carr

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 11, 2004No. CCV-02-11285; A121038Published

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

This appeal from the issuance of a permanent stalking protective order (SPO) presents two issues. First, is a stalking complaint in the form specified by statute adequate to initiate a proceeding to obtain an SPO? Second, if so, is a complaint in that form adequate to dispense with a trial? We answer the first question yes and the second question no. We reverse and remand.

The pertinent facts are procedural. Plaintiff filed a complaint for an SPO in the form specified by ORS 163.744(2). Respondent, who was represented by counsel, filed pretrial motions testing the adequacy of the complaint…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. RangelOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Miller v. LeightyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. K. H. v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API