Legal Opinion

City Products Corp. v. Bennett Bros.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 11, 1957No. Appeal, No. 143PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Arnold,

In this action of assumpsit (sounding in tort) the jury returned a verdict for defendant and the court entered judgment thereon after refusal of plaintiff’s motion for new trial. One of court en banc having died before the opinion was rendered, the judgment was set aside and a reargument had. New trial was then awarded, and defendant now appeals. The award of new trial was on the ground that “the ends of justice require that this case be tried a second time”; although the court observed in its opinion that “We also believe, which we agree is nothing but dictum,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jones Et Vir v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Class & Nachod Brewing Co. v. GiacobelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Bellettiere v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Carroll v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Decker v. KuleszaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Whitman v. RiddellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Stormer v. Alberts Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Mains v. MOORESuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. St. Clair Cemetery Ass'n v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API