Johnson v. Dahlquist
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
— Respondent had an exclusive contract of sale of certain real estate belonging to appellants in "Whatcom county, which contract was dated August 20, 1921, and expired thirty days after date, by virtue of which respondent was to receive as commission all that the land was sold for in excess of $18,800.
*268In his suit, by his amended complaint, respondent alleged that he was entitled to a commission of $1,700, on the ground that he had procured one Corkery as a purchaser of the land for $20,500, and alleged that an agreement was made for Corkery to assume the mortgage for $7,500 against the land,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Weede v. Emma Copper Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1921
- George C. Lemcke Co. v. NordbyWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Keith v. PeartWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- King v. Second Avenue Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921
- Fred B. Grinnell Co. v. StantonWashington Supreme Court · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Graves v. P. J. Taggares Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
- Moe v. WiseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- Johnson v. DahlquistWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- Woods v. GreenblattWashington Supreme Court · 1931
- Moe v. WiseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999