Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Dahlquist

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1924No. 18312PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.

The legality of the levy of an execution is the question involved in this appeal.

In the first place, the plaintiff sued the defendants to recover an alleged indebtedness and secured judgment for $1,700. Upon appeal to this court, the judgment was vacated and the cause returned for a new trial. Costs here were awarded defendant. Johnson v. Dahlquist, 124 Wash. 267, 214 Pac. 157.

While the judgment was in existence, the plaintiff assigned it to his attorney, with instructions that the latter should take out of any amount collected his attorney’s fee, and should then pay various amounts to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Degginger v. Seattle Brewing & Malting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Digney v. BlanchardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  3. Gordon v. HillmanWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Acme Harvesting Machine Co. v. HinkleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Johnson v. DahlquistWashington Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Woody's Olympia Lumber, Inc. v. RoneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  2. United Pacific Insurance v. LundstromWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Brenton Bros. v. DorrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  4. Hendricks & Lewis Pllc v. George ClintonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Swanson v. Olympic Peninsula Motor Coach Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1937

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API