Legal Opinion

In re Conservatorship of Townsend

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 23, 2011No. Docket No. 296358PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, Kathryn Townsend (Townsend), appeals as of right the probate court’s order appointing a conservator over her estate. At issue in this case is whether a conservator may be appointed for a reason not listed in MCL 700.5401, specifically whether a conservator may be appointed for a “vulnerable adult” and, if so, whether the evidence supported the probate court’s finding that Townsend is a vulnerable adult. We conclude that a probate court may appoint a conservator for a vulnerable adult, but under a proper definition of “vulnerable adult,” the facts do not support the probate court’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Manuel v. GillMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Apsey v. Memorial HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  3. In Re BENNETT ESTATEMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Tevis v. AMEX ASSURANCE CO.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Ameritech Publishing, Inc v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. in Re Conservatorship of Rhea BrodyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. In Re CONSERVATORSHIP OF BITTNERMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Vansach v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs. (In re Estate of Vansach)Michigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Parks v. ParksMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Doe v. South Carolina Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API