Legal Opinion

Doe v. South Carolina Department of Social Services

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 30, 2014No. Appellate Case No. 2013-000944; No. 27385PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Beatty

In this direct appeal, Jane Doe appeals the family court’s order declaring her to be a “vulnerable adult” and in need of protective services pursuant to the South Carolina Omnibus Adult Protection Act (“the Act”).2 Doe contends the South Carolina Department of Social Services (“DSS”) failed to prove that she is a vulnerable adult3 at substantial risk of neglect4 due solely to her advanced age. Doe seeks reversal of the family court’s order so that she may be released from involuntary protective custody and returned to her home. Because we find that Doe did not meet the statutory definition of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  2. People v. ClineMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Sloan v. HardeeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  4. Simmons v. SimmonsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  5. Town of Mt. Pleasant v. RobertsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. South Carolina Department of Social Services v. PattenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015
  2. State v. Mack A. GainesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2026
  3. Upon the Petition of Judith Ann ChapmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API