Legal Opinion
Vansach v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs. (In re Estate of Vansach)
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided May 22, 2018No. 334732; No. 336267PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
*376In Docket No. 334732, respondent, the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), appeals as of right a protective order entered by the St. Clair County Probate Court, which ordered that all of Joseph Vansach, Jr.'s income be paid to his wife, Ramona Fenner-Vansach, for the rest of Joseph's life. In Docket No. 336267, the DHHS appeals a similar protective order, entered by the Eaton County Probate Court, directing that all income of Jerome R. Bockes be paid to his wife, Beverly Fay Bockes.1 For the reasons explained in this opinion, we conclude that a probate court has the authority to…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Mathews v. De CastroSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Abela v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Wisconsin Department of Health & Family Services v. BlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Mettler Walloon, LLC v. Melrose TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Ter Beek v. City of WyomingMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Anthony Lacascio v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co of MiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
- Calvin Theological Seminary v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
- George Dernis v. Amos Financial LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
- In Re ESTATE OF SIZICKMichigan Supreme Court · 2026
- Kateri Kilpatrick v. Lansing Community CollegeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2023
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.