Legal Opinion

Dunnington v. Syfers

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1901No. 19,307PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From Hendricks Circuit Court; J. V. Hadley, Judge. Action by M. Helen Dunnington against Eufus K. Syfers and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, C. J.

Appellant originally commenced this action in the Marion Circuit Court against appellees, Eufus *459K. Syfers, Prank A. McBride, and George C. Webster, to recover the sum of $25,000. The venue of the cause was changed to the Hendricks Circuit Court. The following may be said to be an epitome of the facts alleged in the complaint. Appellees herein, together with one Andrew Dunnington, on March 10, 1891, agreed among themselves that they would each contribute $1,500 for the purpose of purchasing from Leslie E. Keeley, of Dwight, in the state of Illinois, the right to use in the states of Indiana…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Oleson v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Gunder v. TibbitsIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Miller v. CoulterIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Shenkenberger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Whitney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1900

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Escallier v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Westfall v. WaitIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Goode v. Elwood Lodge No. 166Indiana Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Estes v. Anderson Oil Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Gipe v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API