Gipe v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Prom Hamilton Circuit Court; Samuel B. Artman, Special Judge. Action by Plora J. Cipe, as administratrix of the estate of Sylvester H. Gipe, deceased, against the Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company. Prom a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.
This action was originally commenced by appellant against appellee, and the Pennsylvania Company, to recover damages for the negligent killing of her decedent. On a former trial the action was dismissed as to the Pennsylvania Company, and judgment rendered against appellee. On appeal to the Supreme Court that judgment was reversed (Pittsburgh, etc., R. Co. v. Gipe [1903], 160 Ind. 360), and the cause returned for a new trial. A substituted amended complaint, an answer in three paragraphs, the first a general denial, and a reply in two paragraphs — one in denial — to the affirmative paragraphs…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Oleson v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Burt v. BowlesIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- National State Bank v. Vigo County National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Phelps v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Plymale v. UprightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Haviland v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
- Estes v. Anderson Oil Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1931
- Southern Railway Co. v. McNeeleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
- Williams v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.