Legal Opinion

Crain v. Siegel

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 17, 1997No. 9601-00783; CA A94932PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Plaintiff brought this action seeking injunctive relief and to quiet title regarding his claim of an easement for the shared use of defendants’ residential driveway. The trial court dismissed plaintiffs claim and granted judgment to defendants on their counterclaims, quieting title in and restraining plaintiff from interfering with defendants’ use and enjoyment of their property. We review de novo, ORS 19.125(3), and affirm.

Defendants have lived on their property since 1964. From the time that they bought their house until 1991, they had an oral agreement with their neighbors, the Kramers,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Yogman v. ParrottOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Waterway Terminals Co. v. P. S. Lord Mechanical ContractorsOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Sproul v. GilbertOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. State v. GarzaOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Wasserburger v. American Scientific Chemical, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. City of Eugene v. MonacoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Johnstone v. ZimmerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. Pfaendler v. BruceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. James River Ins. Co. v. Medolac Labs.District Court, C.D. California · 2018
  5. Baumgarner v. Community Services Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API