Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Allstate Insurance Co. v. Dahan

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 15, 2016No. B259799PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ALDRICH, J.—

INTRODUCTION

A private party who brings a qui tam 1 action for insurance fraud under Insurance Code section 1871.7, 2 where the district attorney and the Insurance Commissioner decline to intervene, is entitled to a portion of the proceeds of the action plus fees and costs. (Id., subd. (g)(2)(A).) In this case we are confronted with the novel question whether the judgment debtor defendants in such an action have standing to challenge the trial court’s postjudgment order allocating the judgment amount between the prevailing plaintiffs, i.e., the private party and the state.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. County of Alameda v. CarlesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. United States of America, Ex Rel. Taxpayers Against Fraud and Chester L. Walsh v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  4. People Ex Rel. Allstate Insurance v. WeitzmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Veterans' Industries, Inc. v. LynchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vitatech Int'l, Inc. v. Sporn, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. Eck v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  3. Knudsen v. Dept. of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  4. Viatech International, Inc. v. SpornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API