Legal Opinion

Duke v. Merkin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 14, 1980No. 6948PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OSBORN, Justice.

The attorneys who represented Appellant in a divorce case obtained a summary judgment against their former client for a part of the fees claimed to be due for services rendered. The trial Court rendered judgment for hourly services performed, and severed the claim for fees based upon a percentage of the net value of property awarded to Appellant in the divorce suit. Having concluded that the severance was improper, the judgment is reversed and the case remanded.

The parties are in basic agreement that Barbara Duke hired William L. Merkin to represent her in a divorce…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Womack v. Allstate Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Hamilton v. HamiltonTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Fantastic Homes, Inc. v. CombsTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Panhandle & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. O'NealCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ryland Group, Inc. v. White, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986
  2. Menchaca v. Menchaca, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1984
  3. Duncan v. Calhoun County Navigation District, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
  4. Lewis v. Exxon Co., USA, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1989
  5. Farrell v. Crossland, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API