Legal Opinion
Duncan v. Calhoun County Navigation District
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided September 28, 2000No. 13-99-343-CV to 13-99-347-CVPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice DORSEY.
Appellants are various landowners upon whose land an easement was acquired through eminent domain by the Calhoun County Navigation District. The Navigation District sought partial summary judgment on the issue of its authority to take the property through the power of eminent domain.1 The trial court granted summary judgment and severed the condemnation proceeding into two cause numbers, separating the issues of “just compensation” fi-om “right to take.”
The landowners here appeal the partial summary judgment granted in favor of the Navigation District. However,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. TippsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- North East Independent School District v. AldridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Guaranty Federal Savings Bank v. Horseshoe Operating Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- Cherokee Water Co. v. ForderhauseTexas Supreme Court · 1982
- Hubler v. City of Corpus ChristiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- City of Carrollton v. SingerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2007
- City of Keller v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Cameron County Drainage District No. 5 v. Pablo S. Gonzales and Lucila E. Gonzales, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
- Whittington v. City of AustinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- 301 White Oak Ranch, Ltd., John D. Manning D/B/A JM Properties, and Auroras, LLP v. Oaks of Trinity Homeowners' Association, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.