Legal Opinion

Panhandle & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. O'Neal

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 17, 1938No. 1817PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRISSOM, Justice.

O’Neal sued the Railway Company for damages alleged to have been sustained by him as the result of an injury suffered while engaged in repairing the defendant’s railway track while O’Neal was. employed as a section hand. The Railway Company pleaded as a complete defense to the cause of action asserted that O’Neal, for a valuable consideration, had released defendant from any claim for damages arising out of the alleged injury. O’Neal answered that the release was not valid because procured by the fraud of defendant’s claim agent. O’Neal alleged that he, when injured, had an…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wilson v. JonesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. PoeTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Wortman v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Home Insurance Co. of New York v. Lake Dallas Gin Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
  5. El Paso & Southwestern Co. v. KramerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Roland v. McCulloughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  2. Stone v. Lawyers Title Insurance Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  3. Dial Temp Air Conditioning Company v. FaulhaberCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  4. Klindworth v. O'CONNORCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  5. Slade v. PhelpsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API