Legal Opinion
Santiago v. Sherwin-Williams Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided July 2, 1992No. CA 87-2799-TPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TAURO, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff Monica Santiago brought this tort action against several defendants 1 alleging that their manufacture of lead pigment for use in lead paint caused her injury. In an earlier opinion, this court refused to apply market share liability theory in the context of lead paint poisoning. Santiago v. Sherwin-Williams Co., 782 F.Supp. 186 (D.Mass.1992) (Santiago I). Presently at issue is whether plaintiff may pursue her claims under either a concert of action or an enterprise liability theory.
The gravamen of plaintiff’s claim is that defendants implicitly agreed to…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Payton v. Abbott LabsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Hymowitz v. Eli Lilly & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Zafft v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dow Chemical Co. v. MahlumNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Monica Santiago v. Sherwin Williams CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Hurt v. Philadelphia Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Hiam v. HomeAway.com, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.