Legal Opinion
Kuenzi v. Radloff
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided October 14, 1948PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.
The plaintiff is licensed under the provisions of sec. 101.31, Stats., as a professional engineer. He has had forty years’ experience in designing buildings, and was licensed in 1932.
In December, 1945, the defendants were considering the erection of a building in the city of Waupun to be occupied by bowling alleys and a tavern. The defendant Radloff consulted the plaintiff, and as result of this consultation the plaintiff wrote the following letter:
“Dec. 29, 1945
“Mr. Harold Radloff
“Waupun, Wisconsin
“Dear Sir:
“I wish to confirm our conversation of some time ago wherein I named you a fee of 3%…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Montello Granite Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Bartelt v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Smith v. StarkeyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Burroughs v. Joint School District No. 2Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- Etscheid v. TiefenthalerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
3Cited by3 opinions
- Goldmann Trust v. GoldmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- City of St. Francis v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Goldmann Trust v. GoldmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965