Legal Opinion

City of St. Francis v. Public Service Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1955PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.

On the question of jurisdiction, the commission contends that its determination of the value is not subject to review under the provisions of ch. 227, Stats. It *93contends that it merely made a finding of fact and did not issue any order or directive. The commission contends that a finding of fact is not reviewable and that there is no statutory provision that the action of- the commission in finding the value of a public utility under the provisions of sec. 66.03 (4), Stats., is reviewable. Said section reads as follows :

“Public utilities. Any public-utility plant, including any dam, power…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. LabutzkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Roberts v. MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Town of Cassian v. Town of NokomisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Village of Milton Junction v. Town of MiltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Burroughs v. Joint School District No. 2Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United Gas Corp. v. Mississippi Public Service CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Public Utilities Commission v. Northwest Water Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  3. City of Hagerstown v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  4. Seebach v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
  5. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Heater Utilities, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API